When it comes down to it, Survivor is essentially the reality version of LOST -- or chronologically, I suppose, LOST is the non-reality version of Survivor. Take a look at this, and then at this: if no one had ever seen either show, they honestly might not be able to tell which promo picture was for which show.
The question I'd like to pose, though, is this: which brilliant creation -- LOST or Survivor -- is more influential for American culture? As a loyal viewer of both, it's hard for me judge objectively, so I'll just lay out the two sides to the argument and you can decide.
Survivor:
Variety just named Survivor the most influential show of the decade. It's true: Survivor created the reality-show-with-a-prize genre, which now dominates television. Think about it, Tila Tequila is famous because of Survivor. If that doesn't do it for you, here's another gem: Tina's rat/snake diatribe from the final tribal council on Season 1 was ranked among the Washington Post archive's "Top 10 Best Speeches," just below -- wait for it -- MLK Jr.'s "I have a dream." So... we currently have Survivor on the same playing field as the civil rights movement and Tila Tequila. Top that, LOST.
LOST:
As we all know and are obsessing about, the final season of LOST premieres on February 2. President Obama usually gives a little-known speech called the State of the Union address in late January, but this year, he considered postponing until the beginning of February: February 2 to be exact. Well, the American public would have none of that. All it took was an uproar from a ridiculous amount of crazed LOST fans for the White House to back down. I think the White House Press Secretary summed it up pretty well: "I don't foresee a scenario in which the millions of people who hope to see a conclusion to 'Lost' are pre-empted by the president."
"True that," responded America.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Episode 404
Uh oh.
This is not good news.
But remember, and I quote: "Television isn't lethal in and of itself." Words to live by.
This is not good news.
But remember, and I quote: "Television isn't lethal in and of itself." Words to live by.
Monday, January 11, 2010
Episode 403
One of the more unique things about television is that it brings stars to life. I'm thinking mostly about morning and variety shows that interview celebrities, and those moments when you realize that the stars you adore are pretty much just as dorky as you. I recently saw an interview with Adam Lambert on the Jay Leno show (not even going to get started on that whole ordeal here), just a few days after the AMA debacle, and I could not believe how completely and utterly normal and down-to-earth he was. For someone who could very easily be aloof and uninterested, he fairly eloquently discussed the AMA issue without cowering, and more impressively, without attacking the offended party. Put this kid in a suit and tie and he could have been interviewing for an entry-level accounting job.
Speaking of singing and celebrities, who knew Ben Folds was so smart? He was one of three judges on the Sing Off, and other than his awkward resemblance to Austin Powers, he was able to show us that he can do more than just be the most ridiculous piano player ever. He was also able to convince the rest of the world that singing isn't only cool when it involves "a karaoke machine and three beers." In fact, the Sing Off itself was successful in so many ways. Like So You Think You Can Dance, it was a showcase of actual talent (sorry American Idol) and also, it exhibited a kind of music that, while popular in some communities, certainly doesn't have much chance to shine. And for those of you who thought Glee couldn't be any more perfect, the Sing Off turned it into a reality show. Near perfection + Reality TV = Perfection.
Speaking of singing and celebrities, who knew Ben Folds was so smart? He was one of three judges on the Sing Off, and other than his awkward resemblance to Austin Powers, he was able to show us that he can do more than just be the most ridiculous piano player ever. He was also able to convince the rest of the world that singing isn't only cool when it involves "a karaoke machine and three beers." In fact, the Sing Off itself was successful in so many ways. Like So You Think You Can Dance, it was a showcase of actual talent (sorry American Idol) and also, it exhibited a kind of music that, while popular in some communities, certainly doesn't have much chance to shine. And for those of you who thought Glee couldn't be any more perfect, the Sing Off turned it into a reality show. Near perfection + Reality TV = Perfection.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Episode 402
Over the holiday break, I had a chance to watch even more daytime television than I normally do. I usually limit myself to shows with some redeeming qualities (Ellen, Full House, etc.) but that is not even close to possible when you literally have nothing to do, as opposed to just doing nothing (the two are very different).
One of the shows that I kept up with was The Price is Right. I need not comment on Drew Carey, as I have taken care of that monstrosity in previous posts, but I'd just like to share a really frightening experience I had while watching TPIR these past couple of weeks.
Everyone remembers the classic game "Now...or Then." If you need a refresher, don't worry, there's a wikipedia entry about it. Now, when we used to watch this show as children -- don't even try to deny it -- you would be comparing the prices of grocery items from "now," whenever that was and "then," which was without fail some far off date in the late 80s or maybe early 90s before you even had any memories. Well, prepare to have your minds blown. The other day on the Price is Right, the THEN date was the year 2000. Two thousand. This means that post-Y2K is now considered "then." As I said, frightening.
This made me think, though, about how television -- in moments like this -- is able to really remind us that time flies and that we're getting old. Thanks TV! Exhibit A: On Saved by the Bell, the gang often references Jason Bateman as the dreamy heartthrob. He even gets a few write-ins for student body president. Now, is this the same Jason Bateman who is always and forever Michael Bluth in our hearts? Yes it is. We're old.
Other than pricing games and reruns, this feeling of "time flies" is all over the place now that child actors are running rampant on new hit shows (Jason Bateman also falls into this category. Well done.) Watching Neil Patrick Harris on How I Met Your Mother is a trip, as is seeing Mark Paul Gosselaar do anything but be Zack Morris, and Joshua Jackson star on a serious lawyer show. Not to mention the remakes of 90210 and the like, where Kelly and Brenda are back as themselves, but they're like...adults. Even the girl from Harriet the Spy is a major TV star now!
I guess comebacks -- as old as they make us feel -- are preferable to drugs and rehab. Maybe.
One of the shows that I kept up with was The Price is Right. I need not comment on Drew Carey, as I have taken care of that monstrosity in previous posts, but I'd just like to share a really frightening experience I had while watching TPIR these past couple of weeks.
Everyone remembers the classic game "Now...or Then." If you need a refresher, don't worry, there's a wikipedia entry about it. Now, when we used to watch this show as children -- don't even try to deny it -- you would be comparing the prices of grocery items from "now," whenever that was and "then," which was without fail some far off date in the late 80s or maybe early 90s before you even had any memories. Well, prepare to have your minds blown. The other day on the Price is Right, the THEN date was the year 2000. Two thousand. This means that post-Y2K is now considered "then." As I said, frightening.
This made me think, though, about how television -- in moments like this -- is able to really remind us that time flies and that we're getting old. Thanks TV! Exhibit A: On Saved by the Bell, the gang often references Jason Bateman as the dreamy heartthrob. He even gets a few write-ins for student body president. Now, is this the same Jason Bateman who is always and forever Michael Bluth in our hearts? Yes it is. We're old.
Other than pricing games and reruns, this feeling of "time flies" is all over the place now that child actors are running rampant on new hit shows (Jason Bateman also falls into this category. Well done.) Watching Neil Patrick Harris on How I Met Your Mother is a trip, as is seeing Mark Paul Gosselaar do anything but be Zack Morris, and Joshua Jackson star on a serious lawyer show. Not to mention the remakes of 90210 and the like, where Kelly and Brenda are back as themselves, but they're like...adults. Even the girl from Harriet the Spy is a major TV star now!
I guess comebacks -- as old as they make us feel -- are preferable to drugs and rehab. Maybe.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Episode 401
Every year at the holidays, my family members buy each other books, pleasure reading about things they're interested in -- the Best Essays of 2009, books about people building orphanages in far off places, collections of stories about medical mysteries. And every year, the joke is that I don't get any books because I don't like to read. I like to watch TV. This year, my family tried to challenge the tradition and buy me a book about TV. It proved difficult. I have read one book about television that I have enjoyed -- it was more about television writing than television itself -- and the rest have fallen flat. It might just be that books are not the right format to talk about TV -- instead, television talk should just keep its rightful place in blogs and magazines. People who are interested enough in television to read a book about it would probably rather take the time to watch more television than to read the book about it. So that's that.
There are millions of blogs out there like this one, each with their own thoughts on the day's, week's, or year's television. For that reason, it's pretty difficult to have an original idea when talking about TV. Think about it this way. If you were, for example, studying female epistolary writing in late sixteenth- and early-seventeenth century Venice, there probably aren't that many other people waking up in the morning thinking about the subject, and therefore possibly scooping your ideas before they're published. On the other hand, how many people wake up each morning poring over last night's episode of Mad Men? How many people make it their goal to determine the winner of The Biggest Loser before the finale airs? Actually, I can sum up this argument in one word: Lostpedia. Everyone thinks about TV.
So as I start Season 4, I thank my audience for reading my blog that I've linked them to instead of taking the effort to find a better one.
If the attention span of TV viewers isn't long -- or consistent -- enough to follow a blog, they can move to even shorter commentary, like those found in the TV section of People magazine. My subscription to People definitely fills my "find out about the people on my fav TV shows" curiosities, but the "find out about the TV itself" curiosities weren't satisfied by the brief little reviews in their TV sections. So, for a holiday gift this year? You guessed it: Entertainment Weekly. It is reading after all.
And just in case even these brief TV magazine reviews that require no loyalty by the reader weren't enough, there's now TV commentary that even the most TV-addicted, short-attention-spanned non-reader can handle: the TV section of someecards. And since I can almost promise that I will never comment on Jersey Shore in my blog, this would be a good place to go if that's what you're looking for. Speaking of Jersey Shore (I hope never to utter those words again), I will actually end with a quote from a People Magazine review of the show that may get some of the strongest reactions of 2010: "This is too ridiculous to be culturally offensive." Agreed.
There are millions of blogs out there like this one, each with their own thoughts on the day's, week's, or year's television. For that reason, it's pretty difficult to have an original idea when talking about TV. Think about it this way. If you were, for example, studying female epistolary writing in late sixteenth- and early-seventeenth century Venice, there probably aren't that many other people waking up in the morning thinking about the subject, and therefore possibly scooping your ideas before they're published. On the other hand, how many people wake up each morning poring over last night's episode of Mad Men? How many people make it their goal to determine the winner of The Biggest Loser before the finale airs? Actually, I can sum up this argument in one word: Lostpedia. Everyone thinks about TV.
So as I start Season 4, I thank my audience for reading my blog that I've linked them to instead of taking the effort to find a better one.
If the attention span of TV viewers isn't long -- or consistent -- enough to follow a blog, they can move to even shorter commentary, like those found in the TV section of People magazine. My subscription to People definitely fills my "find out about the people on my fav TV shows" curiosities, but the "find out about the TV itself" curiosities weren't satisfied by the brief little reviews in their TV sections. So, for a holiday gift this year? You guessed it: Entertainment Weekly. It is reading after all.
And just in case even these brief TV magazine reviews that require no loyalty by the reader weren't enough, there's now TV commentary that even the most TV-addicted, short-attention-spanned non-reader can handle: the TV section of someecards. And since I can almost promise that I will never comment on Jersey Shore in my blog, this would be a good place to go if that's what you're looking for. Speaking of Jersey Shore (I hope never to utter those words again), I will actually end with a quote from a People Magazine review of the show that may get some of the strongest reactions of 2010: "This is too ridiculous to be culturally offensive." Agreed.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Episode 321
As 2009 (and Season 3 of my blog) draws to a close, Top 10 lists seem to be the way to close out the decade. I considered making a top ten of the past ten years of TV, but then I realized that ten years ago "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" was one of my favorite shows, so maybe that wasn't such a good idea. Instead, I have decided to go with:
The Top 10 TV Moments of 2009:
*Note: this will not include such moments as "Kanye drunk stages Taylor", "Oprah says goodbye", "Friday Night Lights announces a new season but it won't air for another year because they just want to make us hate them", etc. While some of these are history-making, others are just awesome.
1) Locke actually is dead. And is Jacob. And our minds are blown. The penultimate season of Lost ends after having redeemed itself with an incredible arc of episodes; the American people realize that 2010 is so close, yet so far away.
2) Jim and Pam get married. This will go down in TV history, and not only because of the brilliant YouTube nod.
3) Glee premieres, creating a completely new television genre, one that incorporates every other amazing aspect of everything else amazing ever (and then Lea Michele sings, sealing the deal).
4) Parks and Recreation hires a new writer's assistant, at which point the show suddenly becomes one of the best on television, thanks mostly to the Andy and Ron moment.
5) Russell finds thee immunity idols on Survivor -- two without any clues -- and re-glorifies the blindside. This might get even crazier by the time the finale airs, but either way proves to us that it's not just Jeff Probst that has made this show last for countless seasons.
6) Dwight and Andy serenade Erin, and then each other, with John Denver in the break room. Musical moments in non-musical shows are, without fail, amazing. (Note: I was hesitant to put two moments of The Office on the list because of the non-world-ending first half of this season, but last night's episode more than made up for it.)
7) Modern Family premieres, reminding us that it is possible to bring back the family sitcom in an age where it's hard to make anything more ridiculous than real-life families.
8) Kevin makes roasted banana, chocolate, and bacon brittle dessert on Top Chef, only to be shot down by the clearly tastebudless judges. All progress Americans have made in the fight against obesity is completely wiped out and we are back to square one. And I'm okay with it.
9) "Legen -- wait for it -- ds of the Fall!" How I Met Your Mother reminds us for the millionth time that its writers are brilliant, almost as brilliant as Neil Patrick Harris.
10) Don Draper dies. Just kidding, I just wanted to be sure you were still reading and I felt bad not putting a Mad Men moment on here.
And while we're on countdowns, 53 DAYS UNTIL LOST RETURNS. 2010, here we come.
The Top 10 TV Moments of 2009:
*Note: this will not include such moments as "Kanye drunk stages Taylor", "Oprah says goodbye", "Friday Night Lights announces a new season but it won't air for another year because they just want to make us hate them", etc. While some of these are history-making, others are just awesome.
1) Locke actually is dead. And is Jacob. And our minds are blown. The penultimate season of Lost ends after having redeemed itself with an incredible arc of episodes; the American people realize that 2010 is so close, yet so far away.
2) Jim and Pam get married. This will go down in TV history, and not only because of the brilliant YouTube nod.
3) Glee premieres, creating a completely new television genre, one that incorporates every other amazing aspect of everything else amazing ever (and then Lea Michele sings, sealing the deal).
4) Parks and Recreation hires a new writer's assistant, at which point the show suddenly becomes one of the best on television, thanks mostly to the Andy and Ron moment.
5) Russell finds thee immunity idols on Survivor -- two without any clues -- and re-glorifies the blindside. This might get even crazier by the time the finale airs, but either way proves to us that it's not just Jeff Probst that has made this show last for countless seasons.
6) Dwight and Andy serenade Erin, and then each other, with John Denver in the break room. Musical moments in non-musical shows are, without fail, amazing. (Note: I was hesitant to put two moments of The Office on the list because of the non-world-ending first half of this season, but last night's episode more than made up for it.)
7) Modern Family premieres, reminding us that it is possible to bring back the family sitcom in an age where it's hard to make anything more ridiculous than real-life families.
8) Kevin makes roasted banana, chocolate, and bacon brittle dessert on Top Chef, only to be shot down by the clearly tastebudless judges. All progress Americans have made in the fight against obesity is completely wiped out and we are back to square one. And I'm okay with it.
9) "Legen -- wait for it -- ds of the Fall!" How I Met Your Mother reminds us for the millionth time that its writers are brilliant, almost as brilliant as Neil Patrick Harris.
10) Don Draper dies. Just kidding, I just wanted to be sure you were still reading and I felt bad not putting a Mad Men moment on here.
And while we're on countdowns, 53 DAYS UNTIL LOST RETURNS. 2010, here we come.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Episode 320
There's a new phenomenon spreading through American sitcoms that might be called the anti-Sam and Diane -- or as I would more likely call it, the anti-Dawson and Joey. So many sitcom couples are now happily united with no sign of anything changing in the near future. When it comes down to it, viewers no longer yearn for the will-they-won't-they drama we've been spoon-fed for years. (Side note: I think this is why the whole Jeff and Britta thing on Community isn't taking off.)
As much as we might miss the awkward and perfect flirtations between Jim and Pam, I think we are all much happier after an episode of The Office when there's no drama in the relationship. And now that they're married, we really don't have to worry (pre-marital sex, maybe, but I don't anticipate a divorce). Now we can watch every episode in peace -- that is, if you call watching Michael tell a group of high school seniors that he can't pay for their college education as he had promised "in peace"...
I similarly enjoy an episode of Gossip Girl so much more when there is no tension between Chuck and Blair. Like Jim and Pam, they are so absolutely perfect for each other that even the thought of them not being together makes the viewing experience less enjoyable. Even though Season 1 was by far the best, it was by no means the easiest to watch. And with this economy (yeah, I said it) maybe that's all viewers are looking for.
This tendency is most relevant -- even if subtle -- on How I Met Your Mother. Over the course of four and a half seasons, we have never had to worry about issues in Ted's relationships, because we know he ends up with the right woman, and we know it's not anyone he's dating on the episodes we're watching. So no matter what ridiculous things he does to mess up relationships, there's no tension.
That said, here are my five favorite current television couples - comments welcome!
1) Coach and Tammy (Friday Night Lights)
2) Chuck and Blair (Gossip Girl)
3) Barney and the entire female gender (How I Met Your Mother)
4) Finn and every female viewer ages 14 - 38 (Glee)
5) Jay and Gloria (Modern Family)
*Honorable mention: Don and Betty (Mad Men) -- I don't feel right putting them on the list because I'm not caught up and something tells me it's not going to end well.
As much as we might miss the awkward and perfect flirtations between Jim and Pam, I think we are all much happier after an episode of The Office when there's no drama in the relationship. And now that they're married, we really don't have to worry (pre-marital sex, maybe, but I don't anticipate a divorce). Now we can watch every episode in peace -- that is, if you call watching Michael tell a group of high school seniors that he can't pay for their college education as he had promised "in peace"...
I similarly enjoy an episode of Gossip Girl so much more when there is no tension between Chuck and Blair. Like Jim and Pam, they are so absolutely perfect for each other that even the thought of them not being together makes the viewing experience less enjoyable. Even though Season 1 was by far the best, it was by no means the easiest to watch. And with this economy (yeah, I said it) maybe that's all viewers are looking for.
This tendency is most relevant -- even if subtle -- on How I Met Your Mother. Over the course of four and a half seasons, we have never had to worry about issues in Ted's relationships, because we know he ends up with the right woman, and we know it's not anyone he's dating on the episodes we're watching. So no matter what ridiculous things he does to mess up relationships, there's no tension.
That said, here are my five favorite current television couples - comments welcome!
1) Coach and Tammy (Friday Night Lights)
2) Chuck and Blair (Gossip Girl)
3) Barney and the entire female gender (How I Met Your Mother)
4) Finn and every female viewer ages 14 - 38 (Glee)
5) Jay and Gloria (Modern Family)
*Honorable mention: Don and Betty (Mad Men) -- I don't feel right putting them on the list because I'm not caught up and something tells me it's not going to end well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)